Description
Ouseley J held that a judge had not erred in refusing to reconsider his decision not to grant a further adjournment of an appeal hearing against a revocation of a premises licence and the consequent dismissal of the appeal. The medical evidence relied upon in support of the adjournment application, namely 2 medical notes that the owner of the claimant company had a back injury and could not attend court, were vague and insufficient to justify a further adjournment, particularly against the background to the manner in which the appeal had been pursued and its general lack of merits.
