Description
It was just and reasonable to vary a final costs order where there had been a material change in circumstances and the court had been misled as to the correct financial position of a party since the making of a judgment and subsequent costs order, and where it had become apparent that another party, against whom no costs order had been made but who had controlled the litigation on behalf of the party ordered to pay the costs, had personally benefited from the litigation, despite that benefit not being a financial one.
