﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Intellectual Property</title>
    <description>Intellectual Property Cases</description>
    <link>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/CaseLaw/tabid/1184/BlogId/649/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <webMaster>registration@casecheck.co.uk</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:10:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 0.0.0.0</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Victor Ifejika v Charles Ifejika &amp; Lens Care Ltd, PCC (judge Birss QC), 23/11/11</title>
      <description>A design registration for a contact lens cleaning device was cancelled because the design did not and had not at the time of registration belonged solely to the registered proprietor. However the claimant's unregistered design rights in certain aspects of the design for a prototype lens cleaning device were valid and had been infringed by the defendants.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/CaseLaw/tabid/1184/EntryID/18267/Default.aspx</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.casecheck.co.uk/Default.aspx?tabid=1184&amp;EntryID=18267</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/DesktopModules/BlogPlus/Trackback.aspx?id=18267</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
