<August 2014>
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
May 2004
May 2002
February 2002
January 2002
October 2001
February 2000
Most recent case entries
Select Your Region: Scotland  England and Wales  UK  Northern Ireland  Europe  All
Selected Region: All
By Law Brief Publishing on 28/08/2014 11:29 AM
The Court of Appeal considered the application of Article 8 ECHR in the case of an assured shorthold tenancy terminated by a valid s.21, Housing Act 1988 notice. The property was let to the tenant by her parents. They fell behind in their mortgage payments and receivers took charge, obtaining a possession order at first instance. The tenant argued Article 8 was applicable and that she was vulnerable. The Court held that there was no "clear and constant" line of authority showing Article 8 app ...
By Law Brief Update on 28/08/2014 11:26 AM
Solicitors representing the purchaser of a yacht under the Mediterranean Yacht Brokers Association memorandum of agreement had not been negligent in failing to obtain a personal guarantee of the yacht's condition from the seller's beneficial owner.
By Law Brief Publishing on 28/08/2014 11:24 AM
The Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago had no proper basis for concluding that the judge at first instance had gone plainly wrong in his assessment of the evidence when absolving an insured of making a fraudulent claim under an insurance policy which covered a fire at its business premises.
By Law Brief Publishing on 27/08/2014 12:59 PM
The defendant had made a false claim of damages regarding a slipping accident. The claimant was the insurer for the company against whom the claim was being sought. The claimant applied to court to commit the defendants to prison for contempt of court as they had embellished and exaggerated their case with scant regard for truth and accuracy. The court concluded that the application for contempt of court must fail as despite the lies, it was unclear as to whether the defendant had lied about whe ...
By Law Brief Publishing on 27/08/2014 12:58 PM
Instructions were given to the Bank of Scotland for a clearing houses automated payment system (CHAPS) payment with the name of the recipient. The account and sort code did not correspond to the name given, but to another bank account. The CHAPS form required identification of the beneficiary's bank, sort code and account number and standard banking practice did not require correspondence between the identifies and the beneficiary's name. A customer who had named a beneficiary correctly, but ent ...
By Law Brief Publishing on 27/08/2014 12:57 PM
The Court of Appeal (CA) allowed a Mother's appeal against Residence Orders made in favour of the paternal grandmother in circumstances where the Local Authority (LA) had arranged the placement and effectively compelled the mother's agreement without assessing her or issuing public law proceedings. The LA did not participate in the appeal despite an invitation from the court. The CA was critical of the manner in which the LA procured the placement of the children.
By Law Brief Publishing on 27/08/2014 12:56 PM
The Court of Appeal (CA) adjourned an application made by parents in person for permission to appeal final care and placement orders. The CA adjourned the matter for a full permission hearing as it was concerned that basis for the order's was the Father's "aggressive failure to co-operate with the LA and Cafcass" and that this did not necessarily lead to the conclusion that he represented a risk of harm to the children.
By Law Brief Publishing on 27/08/2014 12:55 PM
This appeal was brought by a labour only sub-sub-sub-contractor (HS) against a Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decision that it was liable to indemnify the party above it in the contractual chain (Robson) for workmanship defects which caused a flood in a block of flats. The indemnity was said to cover any liability arising out of any breach of the agreement or any act, default or negligence. The TCC held that the indemnity covered the workmanship defects despite Robson having itself insp ...
By Euan A. Dow on 21/08/2014 10:56 AM
Appeal under section 65(8) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995:- The appellant appeared on indictment in relation to charges of theft and assault. On 20 June 2014, the last day of the trial sitting, the Crown moved the court to adjourn the trial and to extend the 12 month time bar. This was due to an essential Crown witness, PC Hardie, being on holiday. The defence opposed any extension to the 12 month time bar. Following submissions the sheriff adjourned the trial diet to the sitting ...
By Euan A. Dow on 21/08/2014 10:52 AM
Criminal note of appeal against conviction and sentence:- The first appellant was convicted after trial of a charge of murder. The only issue at the trial was whether the first appellant was guilty of murder or culpable homicide and to determine that the jury had to decide whether the first appellant actively associated himself with the common criminal purpose by considering the second appellant’s evidence and the evidence of a witness, Boyd. The first appellant contended that there had been a m ...
This content is made available by CaseCheck Limited under a Creative Commons Licence  |  Terms Of Use