Supreme Court - Press Summary BACKGROUND TO THE APPEAL E challenged JFS’s (formerly the Jews’ Free School) refusal to admit his son, M, to the school. JFS is designated as a Jewish faith school. It is over-subscribed and has adopted as its oversubscription policy an approach of giving precedence in admission to those children recognised as Jewish by the Office of the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregation of the Commonwealth (“the OCR”). The OCR only recognise ...
|
Messrs McConkey and Marks were both unsuccessful in employment applications to the Simon Community. The appellants stated that this was because of their convictions for activities in support of the Republican cause in 1975 and 1992 respectively. At all material times in 2000 and 2002, it was agreed that the appellants no longer approved of, or accepted, the use of violence for political ends connected with the affairs of Northern Ireland. The appellants complained to the Fair Employ ...
|
The Income Support (General) Regulations 1987 (“the 1987 Regulations”) entitle disabled persons to a disability premium, except if they are “without accommodation". By this appeal, the appellant, RJM, seeks to establish that the exclusion from disability benefit of disabled persons without accommodation is contrary to art. 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. As a result of his mental health problems, RJM was incapable of w ...
|
This appeal raises difficult questions as to the correct construction or application of provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (“DDA”). The respondent, Mr Malcolm, suffers from schizophrenia. He has had the condition for some time and takes medication for it. For a short time, he did not take his medication and during that time he sub-let the flat that he occupied under a secure tenancy from the appellant Council. The effect of the sub-letting, and his consequent rel ...
|
| 1 |