﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Crofting</title>
    <description>Crofting Law case summaries</description>
    <link>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/CaseLaw/tabid/1184/BlogId/750/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <webMaster>registration@casecheck.co.uk</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 0.0.0.0</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Marie Marion McGrath and Another v Thomas Lorne Nelson [2010] CSOH 149</title>
      <description>This case concerns the validity of a purported transfer of a tenancy of a croft by the majority of the executors of the deceased crofter under the Succession (Scotland) Act 1964 and the Crofters (Scotland) Act 1993.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/CaseLaw/tabid/1184/EntryID/16673/Default.aspx</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.casecheck.co.uk/Default.aspx?tabid=1184&amp;EntryID=16673</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/DesktopModules/BlogPlus/Trackback.aspx?id=16673</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
