﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Defamation</title>
    <description>Defamation Cases</description>
    <link>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/CaseLaw/tabid/1184/BlogId/643/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <webMaster>registration@casecheck.co.uk</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:10:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:10:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 0.0.0.0</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Seaga v. Harper (Jamaica) [2008] UKPC 9 (30 January 2008)</title>
      <description>Qualified privilege – Reynolds privilege available to non-media publishers: A politician who made a defamatory speech at a public meeting could rely upon Reynoldsprivilege if the subject matter was in the public interest and he had acted responsibly in publishing the words.</description>
      <link>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/CaseLaw/tabid/1184/EntryID/14484/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/CaseLaw/tabid/1184/EntryID/14484/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.casecheck.co.uk/Default.aspx?tabid=1184&amp;EntryID=14484</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.casecheck.co.uk/DesktopModules/BlogPlus/Trackback.aspx?id=14484</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
