The CA dismissed a Mother's appeal against an order under the Hague Convetion for the return of her two children to Zimbabwe from where they had been wrongfully removed by her. The CA found the judge had legitimately exercised his residual discretion.
|
The CA dismissed a litigant in person (represented by her Mackenzie friend)'s applications in respect of ancillary relief and costs orders.
|
Finnish authorities' refusal to register a name chosen by the applicant's for their child violated art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The applicant's were awarded 2,000 euros in respect of non pecuniary damage.
|
The CA held that the judgment of a Recorder making a residence order in favour of a mother in circumstances where there was strong expert evidence urging an order in favour of the fathre could not stand. The judge had failed to give appropriate reasons for rejecting the expert evidence and the matter was therefore remitted to a different judge.
|
Within this matter the court isseud procedural guidance in respect of applications under art 11 of Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003 (concerning jurisdictions and recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parenta responsibility) pending the entry into force of the revised Family Proceedings Rules S! 1991/1247.
|
The CA held that the judgment of a Recorder making a residence order in favour of a mother in circumstances where there was strong expert evidence urging an order in favour of the fathre could not stand. The judge had failed to give appropriate reasons for rejecting the expert evidence and the matter was therefore remitted to a different judge.
|
Within this matter the court isseud procedural guidance in respect of applications under art 11 of Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003 (concerning jurisdictions and recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parenta responsibility) pending the entry into force of the revised Family Proceedings Rules S! 1991/1247.
|
The CA dismissed a father's appeal against a committal order made in a case where care proceedings also ongoing. It was held that the judge had been fully entitled to make the judgment he had and the fact that the findings could be used within the care proceedings was neither here nor there.
|
The CA dismissed a father's appeal against a committal order made in a case where care proceedings also ongoing. It was held that the judge had been fully entitled to make the judgment he had and the fact that the findings could be used within the care proceedings was neither here nor there.
|
The CA held that a Judge had been wrong to make an order for contact between a father and a five year old child who was visaully impaired, suffered from an Asperger's type of syndrome and might also have ADHD.
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... |