0 0 1 340 1939 Faculty of Advocates 16 4 2275 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} Criminal Appeal under section 174 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995:- The appellant was charged on a summary complaint in the Justice of the Peace Court in Stonehaven of driving a motor vehicle at a speed in excess o ...
|
0 0 1 463 2641 Faculty of Advocates 22 6 3098 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} Reference by The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission:- On 9 February 2004 at the High Court at Glasgow the appellant was convicted after trial, by a majority verdict, of a charge of murder. The appellant was sen ...
|
0 0 1 776 4424 Faculty of Advocates 36 10 5190 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} Criminal Note of Appeal Against Sentence:- On 31 May 2011, at Oban Sheriff Court, the appellants pled guilty, by way of accelerated indictment procedure under Section 76 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, ...
|
0 0 1 342 1954 Faculty of Advocates 16 4 2292 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} Criminal Note of Appeal against Conviction:- On 28 January 2011 at the High Court at Glasgow the appellant was convicted unanimously of the following charge:- "On 1 January 2010 at 115 Glenavon Road, Glasgow you ...
|
0 0 1 532 3037 Faculty of Advocates 25 7 3562 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} Criminal Note of Appeal Against Conviction:- On 14 June 2010 at Aberdeen Sheriff Court the appellant was convicted after trial of a charge of taking or permitting to be taken or make 243 indecent photographs or pseud ...
|
0 0 1 316 1803 Faculty of Advocates 15 4 2115 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} Criminal Note of Appeal Against Conviction:- On 26 August 2010 at Edinburgh High Court the appellant was convicted after trial of the following charge:- "On 1 March 2010 at ... you...did assault … and ...
|
0 0 1 222 1272 Faculty of Advocates 10 2 1492 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Cambria;} Criminal Sentencing:- This was a hearing of seven appeals against sentence before 5 judges which raised important questions of principle on sentence discounting. In Spence v H.M.A. (2008 JC 174) the court gave general guidanc ...
|
The Claimant was charged with an offence of battery and bailed to appear at the Epping Magistrates' Court on the 1st September 2010. On that date the Appellant entered a not guilty plea and the advocates completed a case progression form with a view to the future management of the case. Amongst the entries endorsed upon the form by the then Defence advocate was "assault on def by Complainant...only contact made was in self-defence" thereby informing the Court and the Prosecution that the Claiman ...
|
The Appellant was on bail to attend the Crown Court for a plea and case management hearing on the 1st March 2011. On the 1st March 2011 the Appellant attended at the Crown Court and met his advocate. The advocate duly informed the usher that the Appellant was in attendance. The Appellant and his advocate then had a conference, which concluded at approximately 11.30 hours. When the case was mentioned in Court, at 12.45 hours, it was discovered that the Appellant had left the Court building. After ...
|
On the 16th December 2010 the Appellant was made the subject of a suspended sentence order (the operational period of which was two years) for offences of dwelling-house burglary and criminal damage. On the 7th February 2011 the Appellant committed another offence of dwelling-house burglary. On the 13th May 2011 the Appellant appeared to be sentenced for the offence of dwelling-house burglary committed on the 7th February 2011 and for breach of the suspended sentence order. The Appellant was sen ...
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... |