The appellant (A) appealed against the decision of the CA that it had not entered into a contract with the respondent (R). Although the parties had intended that a written contract would set out the terms on which the work was to be carried out, work had begun before the terms were finalised. For the purpose of enabling the work to begin, and while continuing to negotiate the full contract terms, the parties had entered into a contract formed by a letter of intent.The Supreme Court restated the ...
|
The appellant (A) appealed against the decision of the CA that it had not entered into a contract with the respondent (R). Although the parties had intended that a written contract would set out the terms on which the work was to be carried out, work had begun before the terms were finalised. For the purpose of enabling the work to begin, and while continuing to negotiate the full contract terms, the parties had entered into a contract formed by a letter of intent.The Supreme Court restated the ...
|
| 1 |