Debate:- In November 2006 the pursuers, a firm of building contractors, entered into a contract with the defenders for the construction of works in a site at New Stevenston Road, Carfin. The defenders were the employers in terms of the contract and appointed the Mason Evans Partnership as the Engineer under the contract. In this action the pursuers sought payment of sums owing plus interest. The pursuers claimed payment of an amout of £1,136,525, as certified by the Engineer, less payments ...
|
Reclaiming Motion:- In this action the appellant sought damages from the respondents for a breach of contract. The appellant enrolled with the respondents to become a professional golfer and attended and satisfactorily completed training courses and became entitled to sit the respondents' final examination. He was required as part of that final examination to sit a practical test. He passed all parts of this examination with the exception of the part relating to the alteration and repair of golf ...
|
Petition for Partial Recall of Inhibition:- The petitioners were spouses who formally traded from a restaurant in Bothwell which they occupied under a long lease. In 2006 another couple obtained an interest in the business and entered into a partnership with the petitioners. Later in the same year an action was raised by the respondent in Hamilton Sheriff Court against all four partners seeking payment of a sum of £204,000. The petitioners were inhibited by the respondents by letters of inh ...
|
Amendment Procedure:- The pursuers raised the action in September 2002, and was founded upon alleged breaches of collateral undertakings which the respective defenders granted in the pursuers' favour relative to the conduct of the reconstruction works. Further, the pursuers asserted a contractual right, by virtue of the same collateral undertakings, to be indemnified against the losses which they sustained. Previously, in November 2007, the court rejected the defenders' challenge to the pursuers ...
|
Proof:- In this action the pursuers sought to recover architects fees from the defenders in relation to a hotel development at a golf and country club in Cheshire. Around 1994, the pursuers, a firm of architects began carrying out work for the defenders, a hospitality company which owns and develops hotels. Evidence was led on behalf of both parties. The pursuers' claimed that they were entitled to the sum sued for as being fees due under the normal percentage fee arrangement that operated betwe ...
|
Contract of Sale and Consumer Credit Contract - whether rescinded – measure of damages The Pursuer purchased a laptop computer from the First Defenders’ retail outlet, PC World, on the understanding that he could return it if it did not have an internal modem. He paid £50 and signed a credit agreement with the Second Defenders. The laptop did not have an internal modem but PC World refused to accept the return of the computer and did not take any steps to repay the Pursuer or t ...
|
Contract - Partnership Agreement- Mutuality of Contract - Retention of performance on basis of Pursuer's breach of fiduciary duty The Pursuer was a former partner in a firm of Stranraer solicitors. He had acted fraudulently when dealing with clients. He accepted that he was in breach of the fiduciary duty he owed to his partners and, therefore, in breach of the partnership agreement. He raised an action in the Commercial Court against the firm and his former partners for payment of a pension. T ...
|
Summary Decree - Contract :- In this action the pursuers sought damages for a breach of contract by the defenders. The pursuers, as travel agents, were approached by 189 clients who were to take part in the island games in Rhodes, Greece. The pursuers approached the defenders, who were aircraft brokers, to provide aircraft for the outward flight from Scotland to Rhodes and the return flight to Scotland and by exchange of emails in January 2007, an agreement was reached between the pursuers and t ...
|
Procedure Roll - Contract:- In this action the pursuers were property investors, the first defenders were insurance brokers and the second defender was a director and employee of the first defenders. The pursuers owned a block of property in Wishaw and insurance of the property was arranged through the defenders. The premises were affected by fires, on 11 September 2002 , 28 November 2002 and 10 December 2002. Here the pursuers sought to recover from the defenders the losses they suffered by rea ...
|
Reclaiming Motion - Contract:- The pursuer built a block of flats in 1995 with the assistance of borrowings obtained from the defenders, which were secured over the new development. The pursuer was unable to repay the borrowings and the defenders called up their security, and took possession of the subjects in September 1996. The subjects were thereafter sold, however, the pursuer was dissatisfied with the price obtained and here the pursuer sought damages from the defenders on the basis that th ...
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 |