The defenders are seeking to have the action dismissed on the basis that the action was time barred and lacking in relevancy. The pursuer avers that he suffered anxiety distress and ill-health as a consequence of the defenders breach of probation and these are averments of personal injury.
|
The pursuers have raised this action against the defenders on the basis that they agreed a contract with the defenders which would entitle them to payment of a monthly sum for the duration of the defenders facilities management contract with BT which was for five years. Of a total sixty payments only 29 were made. The defenders contend that they have paid all sums contractually due to the due to the pursuers.
|
Present litigations are concerned with the validity or otherwise of a Notice of Arbitration which referred the dispute between the parties to arbitration.In Action No.1 Scrabster seek a declarator that the Notice was invalid and of no effect. The basis of Scrabsters attack on the validity of the Notice of Arbitration is that it failed to comply with the provisions of Article 1 of the Scottish Arbitration Code.
|
Initially an application for taxi licences from the respondents was refused. It was then allowed following an appeal to the sheriff court. The appellants have exercised their right as a party to the appeal to the sheriff to appeal to this court against that decision under para 18(12) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act.
|
Rectification:
The pursuers seek rectification of the disposition in their favour by the substitution for the inaccurate plan of a plan which accurately delineates the boundaries of the subjects which they had agreed to purchase. They also seek declarator that they are and have been since the date of entry in possession of the subjects delineated in the proposed substitute plan. Thirdly they seek rectification of the corresponding title sheet in the Land Register of Scotland (DMF 1659) so as to include the gro ...
|
| 1 |